Planning from ‘Below’ in Israel: Reflections on the Public Interest
AbstractThe purpose of this paper is to analyze the transformations that have taken place in planning discourse in the last two centuries in the West and in Israel. The paper focuses on the importance given to the public interest in what is termed “planning from 'above'” and “planning from 'below'.” As argued in the paper, this analysis provides a useful context for a new line of thinking that distinguishes between planning for practical changes and 'planning' for strategic changes. This distinction, it is argued, helps to explore a critical perspective of planning from 'below' and the role of public interest in it.
Alfasi, N. (2003) Is public participation making urban planning more democratic? The Israeli experience. Planning, Theory and Practice. 4,2: 185-202.
Alfasi, N. and Portugali, J. (2007) Planning rules for a self-planned city. Planning Theory, 6 ,2: 146-163.
Bauman, Z. (2002) Globalization: The Human Consequences. Tel Aviv: Hakibbutz Hameuchad . (Hebrew)
Ben-David, Y. (1991) The Negev Bedouin: From nomadism to agriculture. In: Kark, R. (ed.) The Land that Became Israel: Studies in Historical Geography. Jerusalem: Magness Press, pp. 181-195.
Ben-Eliezer, U. (1999), The creation of civil society in Israel: Politics and identity in new NGO's. Israeli Sociology, 2, 1: 51-97.
Bimkom (2003) Planning Rights Workshop Report: Kasr el Sir Village in the Negev. Jerusalem: Bimkom. (Hebrew)
Castells, M. (1976) The Urban Question. London: Edward Arnolds.
Davidoff, P. (1965) Advocacy and pluralism in planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planning, 31: 331-338.
Fainstein, S. (2000) New directions in planning theory. Urban Affairs Review, 35, 4: 451-478.
Fenster, T. (1998) Ethnicity, citizenship and gender: The case of Ethiopian immigrant women in Israel. Gender, Place and Culture 5,2: 177-89.
Fenster, T. (1999) Space for gender: Cultural roles of the forbidden and the permitted. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 17: 227-46.
Fenster, T. (2004) The Global City and the Holy City: Narratives on Planning, Knowledge and Diversity, London: Pearson.
Fenster, T. (2007) Memory, belonging and spatial planning in Israel. Teoria u Bikoret, 30: 189-213 (Hebrew)
Forester, J. (1989) Planning in the Face of Power. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Forester, J. (1999) The Deliberative Practitioner. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Friedman, J. (1973) Retracking America. New York: Doubleday Anchor.
Goren, T. (2006) Fall of Arab Haifa in 1948. Sde Boker: Ben Gurion Research Institute. (Hebrew)
Harvey, D. (1973) Social Justice and the City. London: Edward Arnolds.
Harvey, D. (1999) Frontiers of Insurgent Planning. Plurimondi, 2: 269-286.
Healey, P. (1992) A planner’s day: Knowledge and action in communicative perspective. Journal of the American Planning Association, 58,1: 9-20.
Healey, P. (1997) Collaborative Planning. London: Macmillan Press.
Innes, J. (1995) Planning theory’s emerging paradigm: Communicative action and interactive practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 14,3: 183-90.
Kalush, R. and Law-Yone, H. (2000), The national home/personal home: The
role of public housing in shaping space. Teoria u Bikoret, 16: 153-180. (Hebrew)
Kaplan, S. (1997) Daily resistance among the Ethiopian Jews. Teoria u Bikoret, 10: 163-174. (Hebrew)
Kimmerling, B. (2004) Immigrants, Settlers, Natives: The Israeli State and Society Between Cultural Pluralism and Cultural Wars. Tel Aviv: Am Oved Publishers. (Hebrew)
Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. (1985/2004) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. Tel Aviv: Resling Publishers. (Hebrew)
Law-Yone, H. (2007) Planning rights: Is it really? Planning Rights Report, Jerusalem: Bimkom. (Hebrew)
Levy, C. (1996) The process of institutionalizing gender in policy and planning: The 'web' of institutionalization. Development Planning Unit, University College, London, Working Papers, 74.
Meir, A. (2003) From Planning Advocacy to Independent Planning: The Negev Bedouin on the Path to Democratization in Planning. Negev Center for Regional Development, Beer-Sheva: Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. (Hebrew)
Molineux, M. (1985) Mobilization without emancipation? Women's interests, the state, and revolution in Nicaragua. Feminist Studies, 11: 227-254.
Moser, C. (1993) Gender, Planning and Development. London: Routledge.
Paz, Y. (1998) Preserving architectural heritage in deserted neighborhoods after Independence War. Cathedra for the History of Eretz Israel and its Yishuv, 88: 95-134. [Hebrew]
Portugali, J. (1996) Implicate Relations. Tel Aviv: Hakibbutz HaMeuchad. (Hebrew)
Sandercock, L. (1998) Towards Cosmopolis. London: Wiley.
Sharon, S. (2006) Planners, the state and the shaping of national space in the 1950s. Teoria u Bikoret, 29: 31-58. (Hebrew)
Shenhav, Y. (2003) The Arab-Jews: Nationalism, Religion and Ethnicity. Tel Aviv: Am Oved Publishers. (Hebrew)
Tzfadia, E. and Yiftachel, O. (2004) Between urban and national: Political mobilization among Mizrahim in Israel’s ‘Development Towns’. Cities: The International Journal of Urban Policy and Planning, 21 (1): 41-55.
Yacobi, H., (2007) The NGOization of space: Dilemmas of social change, planning policy and the Israeli public sphere. Environment and Planning D, 25: 745- 758.
Yahel, H. (2006) Land disputes between the Negev Bedouin and Israel. Israel Studies, 11,2: 1-22.
Yiftachel, O. (2000) Ethnocracy and its discontents: Minorities, protests and the Israeli polity. Critical Inquiry, 26,4: 725-56.
Yiftachel, O. (2001) The homeland and nationalism. Encyclopedia of Nationalism, 1, pp. 359-383.
Yiftachel, O. (2006) Ethnocracy: Land and Identity Politics in Israel/Palestine, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Yishai, Y. (1998) Israeli Society Towards 2000. Jerusalem: School of Social Work, Hebrew University. (Hebrew).
Yishai, Y. (2003) Between Recruitment and Conciliation: Civil Society in Israel,
Yonah, Y., and Shenhav, Y. (2005) What is Multiculturalism? The Politics of Difference in Israel.
Tel Aviv: Babel Publishers. (Hebrew)
- The contributor(s) (authors) warrant that the entire work is original and unpublished; it is submitted only to this Journal and all text, data, figures/tables or other illustrations included in this work are completely original and unpublished, and these have not been previously published or submitted elsewhere in any form or media whatsoever.
- The contributor(s) warrant that the work contains no unlawful or libelous statements and opinions and liable materials of any kind whatsoever, does not infringe on any copyrights, intellectual property rights, personal rights or rights of any kind of others, nor contains any plagiarized, fraudulent, improperly attributed materials, instructions, procedures, information or ideas that might cause any harm, damage, injury, losses or costs of any kind to person or property.
- The contributor(s) retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- The contributor(s) are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- The contributor(s) are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- Geography Research Forum may disseminate the content of the publications and publications’ Meta data in text, image, or other print and electronic formats to providers of research databases (e.g. EBSCO, GeoBase, JSTOR) to facilitate publications' exposure.